Priorities & Grass Roots » Legislative Advocacy Regulatory Advocacy Judicial Advocacy 2008 Policies & Backgrounds 2008 Voting Record Legislative Bill Tracker Find your Legislator Voter Resources Policy Committees Links

Health Care Privacy

Issue

How do we protect medical records and patient confidentiality without jeopardizing access to critical research, public health and consumer information needs?

Policy

  • Minnesotans expect, and under Minnesota and federal law are currently entitled to, confidential treatment of their medical records.
  • Overly restrictive proposals that limit access to medical information by health researchers, payers and providers jeopardize the quality of patient care, the choices patients have in the market and the effectiveness of our health care system.
  • Health care information and databases are useful tools for purchasers, health plans and providers in improving health, evaluating quality and outcomes, and containing costs. Records-based research is vital to provide appropriate, quality, cost-effective health care.
  • Employers should not be prohibited from accessing their group claims experience and loss experience information.
  • Oppose "opt-in" informed consent requirements for data that is encoded or encrypted so that it does not directly identify a patient.

Business Impact

Minnesota has some of the strictest health care privacy laws in the nation. Minnesota law requires that when information is released, all patient identifiers be encrypted to ensure patient confidentiality. As of January 1, 1997, providers must do the following: first, notify, in writing, all patients seeking medical care that medical records may be released for research and that the patient may object; second, obtain the patient's authorization for the release of records for research, which does not expire, but may be revoked; and third, on request, inform subjects whose records were released and tell them how they can contact the investigators. Also, under state law, health plan companies cannot sell patient data.

"Opt-in" requires patients to provide consent each time a medical record is used for research, even if this information is encoded or encrypted and cannot identify the patient. Access to medical information that is encoded or encrypted is necessary to protect the health of Minnesotans and provide them with information necessary to make informed health care choices. Researchers use encoded or encrypted information to study patterns of the course of diseases and for comparing outcomes of various treatments. Results from these studies are vital to fostering continued improvements in health care for future generations. More and more, information is used to measure performance outcomes of doctors, clinics and hospitals to provide consumers with information about best practices and quality of care. Limiting access to encoded or encrypted information could make this information obsolete.

Optional patient participation makes statewide assessments and other research data statistically unsound. Without sufficient numbers of people participating in these studies, many become statistically invalid. A study by the Rochester Mayo Clinic also found that there are statistically significant differences in who consents to providing information, with respect to age and disease category. This severely limits research capabilities for populations most in need.

Site Map|Privacy & Security|Contact Us|Send Feedback
© Copyright 2008 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. All Rights Reserved.

This web site is developed and owned by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. Any use or reprinting is strictly prohibited without prior consent of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.