Legislative leaders shared their views at Session Priorities: (from left) Senate Majority Leader David Senjem, House Speaker Kurt Zellers, moderator Tom Hauser of KSTP-TV, House Minority Leader Paul Thissen, Senate Minority Leader Tom Bakk. Involta broke ground in September for a $10.5 million data center in Duluth:(from left) Lonnie Bloomquist of Involta; Nancy Norr of Minnesota Power; Senator Roger Reinert; Involta CEO Bruce Lehrman; DEED Commissioner Mark Phillips; County Commissioner Steve O'Neil; David Ross of the Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce; Mayor Don Ness. Joe Swedberg (left), vice president of legislative affairs at Hormel Foods Corporation in Austin, visits with Dr. Zigang Dong, executive director of The Hormel Institute, during a tour by Leadership Minnesota. Bob Anderson (left), who recently retired from Boise Paper at International Falls, receives the Spirit of Minnesota Award from Jon Campbell, chair of the Minnesota Chamber Board. Current Minnesota Chamber board members Jan Kruchoski and Sanjay Kuba, and former member Russ Nelson, had a personal audience with Governor Mark Dayton at Session Priorities. Jay Timmons, president and chief executive officer of the National Association of Manufacturers, addresses the Minnesota Manufacturers Summit.


Twitter   LinkedIn   

Whistleblower Act

Issue

Should Minnesota’s Whistleblower Act be limited to situations in which public policy has been violated? Should Minnesota expand whistleblower protection to good-faith private employee statements, regardless of the veracity of the statements?

Policy

The Legislature should require that Whistleblower Act claims involve a violation of public policy. Throughout the years, Minnesota courts have decided cases on both sides of the issue. However, one of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s latest rulings, Marguerite Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women’s Center, Inc., states that a plaintiff does not have to establish that the reported violation of law implicates public policy. Since this decision will guide future court decisions, the Legislature should amend the Whistleblower Act and make it clear that the act requires reported violations of law harming the public welfare.

Moreover, the Minnesota Chamber opposes further expansion of Whistleblower protection to good-faith private employee statements to the public (regarding issues like public safety, health or the environment) that the employee believes to be true, regardless of the veracity of the statements. In 2007, legislation was introduced that protected such statements by public and private-sector employees; the bill ultimately was narrowed to exclude its application to the private sector. The Chamber believes that existing whistleblower laws sufficiently protect truthful employee statements.

Business Impact

If the Whistleblower Act remains unchanged, courts will continue to rule that plaintiffs can bring claims under the act even if the alleged violation of law does not concern public policy. That means that every time employees are terminated, employers could potentially face a whistleblower claim. Further, extension of whistleblower protection in the private sector to good-faith employee statements, regardless of their truth, would adversely affect Minnesota’s business climate. Proprietary information could be exposed, and unwarranted negative publicity could result, if such statements were protected.

This website is developed and owned by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. Any use or reprinting is strictly prohibited without prior consent of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.