Priorities & Grass Roots » Legislative Advocacy Regulatory Advocacy Judicial Advocacy 2008 Policies & Backgrounds 2008 Voting Record Legislative Bill Tracker Find your Legislator Voter Resources Policy Committees Links

Water Protection

Issue

Should the Legislature provide funding for the protection and restoration of Minnesota's lakes and streams?

Policy

  • The protection and restoration of Minnesota's lakes and streams is not only an important civic responsibility of stewardship of our natural resources, it is essential to Minnesota's economy. The tourism/recreation industries, manufacturing and agriculture rely on our water resources. Under the federal Clean Water Act, failing to meet water quality standards could prevent business expansion and development.
  • The Pollution Control Agency (PCA) and other state agencies and local units of government must implement section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (impaired waters/Total Maximum Daily Load) in a timely manner, through a process that is based on sound science and that provides for open participation and input by all stakeholders.
  • In 2006, the Minnesota Chamber supported passage of the Clean Water Legacy Act which creates a policy framework for implementation of the federally mandated impaired waters program. The new law requires coordination and cooperation among state agencies and local units of government, sets goals and priorities for assessing, evaluating and restoring impaired waters, and establishes a mechanism for ongoing oversight of program implementation.
  • The Minnesota Chamber recognizes that the identification, evaluation and restoration of lakes and streams that do not meet water quality standards will require significant financial resources. In 2006, the Legislature provided a one-time appropriation of $25 million from the general fund, environmental trust fund and bonding to begin implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. In 2007, the Legislature appropriated $54 million from existing revenue to fund the program for the 2008-2009 biennium, but failed to agree on a long-term revenue source. The Chamber supports funding for the program from the general fund or environmental trust fund and bonding. Appropriations from the general fund must be from existing revenue, not a tax increase.
  • The Legislature, governor and the Clean Water Council established in the Act must ensure that the agencies and departments responsible for implementing the Clean Water Legacy Act fulfill the goal of achieving and maintaining water quality standards. All programs must include outcome-based performance measures that will quantify the impact of expenditures on a project and watershed level.

Business Impact

Minnesota has more shoreline from lakes and steams than any other state except Alaska. The abundance of our water resource is an aesthetic value to our citizens that is priceless. We have recreational opportunities that few other states enjoy. Our water resource is essential to our economic vitality as well.

This abundance of water presents a potential pitfall. If Minnesota's waters fail to achieve water quality standards, not only will our personal enjoyment of our lakes and rivers be reduced, but our economy could be seriously affected. Tourism is a $10 billion industry. Agriculture, food processing and manufacturing have a distinct competitive advantage due to our water resource. All states must comply with the federal Clean Water Act requirement to meet water quality standards, but Minnesota business has potentially more to lose than most states for failure to achieve standards. Because we have more waters that could be impaired, the costs to assess and restore them will be much greater than most states. The law limits new or increased discharges into impaired waters, thereby potentially preventing business expansion or new facilities.

The state has assessed only 16 percent of our lakes and 10 percent of our streams. Of those waters assessed, 40 percent were found to be impaired (nearly 2,300). A 2003 report to the Legislature by the PCA estimated the long-term cost to restore these waters to range from $600 million to $3 billion. Existing state resources are not adequate to address this problem. A stakeholders group created by the Pawlenty Administration has estimated the annual revenue need in the range of $85 million to $100 million.

Site Map|Privacy & Security|Contact Us|Send Feedback
© Copyright 2008 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. All Rights Reserved.

This web site is developed and owned by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. Any use or reprinting is strictly prohibited without prior consent of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.